It looks like nothing was found at this location. Maybe try a search or one of the links below?
Recent Posts
- Appellate Court Invalidates Substituted Service Under CCP 415.20(c) at a Commercial Mail Receiving Agency
- New Procedures and Forms for California Unlawful Detainer Cases – September 1, 2020
- New Levy Forms – September 1, 2020 (Updated Feb. 2024)
- New Policy for 3-Day Notice Services Update
- New Policy for 3-Day Notice Services?
Archives
Categories
Tags
Pages
- 2016 PSI Seminars and Events
- 2016CALSProLegislativeProposals
- 2018 Changes to Enforcement of Judgments forms
- AFF-POS
- Affidavit and Proof of Service Requirements Guide, California Edition
- American Express Centurion Bank v. Zara – Court invalidates service based upon faulty proof of service
- Arrieta v. Mahon – Marshall cannot evict tenant unless tenant has been named in the unlawful detainer lawsuit
- B&P Code § 17538.5 – Commercial Mail Receiving Agency
- Bank of New York Mellon v. Preciado – Court Invalidates Service Because of Insufficient Proof of Service of Notice to Tenant
- Bein v. Brechtel-Jochim Group, Inc. – Service on Guard at Gated Community
- Blog
- Books and Materials
- California Code Sections Describing Manners of Service
- California Process Serving Cases and Opinions
- California Process Serving Laws
- California Registered Process Server Law
- Carol Gilbert, Inc. v. Haller – Summons that does not include defendant’s name of Doe defendant is invalid
- Carr v. Kamins – Service by publication of a quiet title action invalidated on former owner’s daughter who lives at the subject property.
- CCP § 415.20 – Substituted Service
- CCP415.20ProposedLegislation
- Checkout
- Citizens for Civic Accountability v. Town of Danville – Clerk’s e-mailed judgment, in accordance with trial court’s electronic fling and service order. does not constituted “mail” to trigger 60-day notice of appeal requirement in California Rule of Court 8.104(a)(1).
- Contact
- Continuing Education Materials
- Cory v. Crocker National Bank Capacity notice improperly marked on summons substantially complied with the statute because the corporation was the only named party and the proper person was served
- Court Opinions
- Criminal Trespass in California – Process Servers
- Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP – Employee non-competition agreements invalidated unless they fall within a statutory exception
- Ellard v. Conway – Substituted service proper at Commercial Mail Receiving Agency, and due diligence requirement was satisfied by ascertaining forwarding address from US Postal Service
- Events
- Federal Witness Fee References
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Golden v. Dungan – Process server who pounded on a door at midnight in a loud and boisterous manner may be actionable as a claim for emotional distress
- Home
- How to Become a California Registered Process Server
- In re Ball – Personal service defined
- Khourie, Crew & Jaeger v. Sabek, Inc. – Defendant will not be permitted to defeat service by rendering service impossible
- Laws
- Ludka v. Memory Magnetics Int’l – Service made on a person sharing an office with the defendant, but not working for the same company, was legal and valid
- Mailchimp
- MJS Enterprises, Inc. v. Superior Court (Serpa) – It is the capacity notice on the summons, not the process server’s proof of service, which asserts judicial power
- Palm Property Investments, LLC v. Yadegar – Court erred in not applying evidentiary presumption of a registered process server’s proof of service under Evidence Code § 647
- Pasadena Medi-Center Associates v. Superior Court – Service on a person has ostensible authority to accept service when represented as corporate officer of the corporation
- PayPal Payment – Seminar and Event
- Pelayo v. J. J. Lee Management Co., Inc. (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 484
- Portico Management Group, LLC v. Harrison – Judgment rendered against a trust, and not its trustee, is unenforceable
- Process Server Helpful Links
- Ramos v. Homeward Residential, Inc. – Default Judgment Vacated for Failure to Properly Serve Corporation
- Resources
- RPSActProposedAmendment
- Sanford v. Smith – Service by publication invalid without declaration re diligent search
- Seminars and Events
- Service Packages
- Slaughter v. Legal Process & Courier Service – Process server’s false proof of service is a foreseeable act resulting in negligent infliction of emotional distress
- Sole Proprietorship
- Summary – American Express Centurion Bank v. Zara
- Summary – Bank of New York Mellon v. Preciado
- Summary – Carol Gilbert, Inc. v. Haller
- Summary – Citizens for Public Accountability v. Danville
- Summary – Palm Properties Investments, LLC v. Yadegar
- Summary – Portico Management Group LLC v. Harrison
- Summary – Ramos v. Homeward Residential, Inc.
- Thank You – Seminar
- The Registered Process Server’s Guide to Service of Process in California, 5th Edition
- The Registered Process Server’s Guide to Service of Writs of Attachment and Writs of Execution, 3d Edition
- Trujillo v. Trujillo – Announcing Service in a “Loud and Clear Voice”
- US Laws Prohibiting Interference with Service of Process
- US Process Serving Laws
- US Trespass Laws – Process Servers
- What is the Witness Fee for Federal Subpoenas?
- What’s New in 2016 Dinner Presentation Survey